Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 05:25:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Juj Chan Hyjun
Subject: THE ANTI TRIZ-JOURNAL (Vol. 3, No. 8) EDITORIAL
To: karasik@sympatico.ca, editor@TRIZ-JOURNAL.COM

Dear Editor,

My name is Juj Chan Hyjun and I study TRIZ for few years. I try watch TRIZ activities in China, so I read your "How the great march of the West to China helps TRIZ advancement" (http://www3.sympatico.ca/karasik/editorial_september_2004.html). After this paper I read few others in your journal and was shoked by your unpoliteness.

I'd agree that mainland is not the only cause of oil prices even I observe more and more cars in our streets. Price for oil dictates by producers not but consumers.

I'd make more general comment that follows from your article: EDITORS OF THE ANTI TRIZ-JOURNAL DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT THE PHYSICAL CONTRADICTIONS WELL KNOWN IN TRIZ DUE TO ALTSHULLER. It seems that their TRIZ knoledge limitid to 40 principles and matrix. TOO BAD, ESPESIALLY BECAUSE THEY BLAME ALMOST EACH SINGLE AUTHOR OF WWW.TRIZ-JOURNAL.COM (except papers published there by Karasik of cause). OFTEN THE CRITIQUE IS NOT RELEVANT AND HAS NO VALUE EXCEPT TO CONFIRM THAT PEOPLE WHO WRITE FOR THE ANTI TRIZ-JOURNAL CONSIDER THEMSELVES SMARTER THAN AUTHORS OF WWW.TRIZ-JOURNAL.COM .

Please publish my opinion.

Sincerely,

Juj Chan Hyjun


Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:36 AM
From: Yevgeny Karasik
Subject: Re: THE ANTI TRIZ-JOURNAL (Vol. 3, No. 8) EDITORIAL
To: Juj Chan Hyjun

Dear Mr. Hyjun,

thank you for the letter. I will, of course, publish it in the December issue. However, I would like to know why do you think that we do not know about physical contradictions ? Which irrelevant critique did you find in the journal ?

Sincerely,

Yevgeny Karasik, editor,
Anti TRIZ-journal


Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 04:39:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Juj Chan Hyjun
Subject: Re: THE ANTI TRIZ-JOURNAL (Vol. 3, No. 8) EDITORIAL
To: karasik@sympatico.ca, editor@TRIZ-JOURNAL.COM

Dear Mr. Karasik,

thank you for the openess for publication.

1) >why do you think that we do not know about physical contradictions ?

I quote http://www3.sympatico.ca/karasik/editorial_september_2004.html: "It is only in TRIZ that contradictions take place between two parameters only: gain in one parameter results in loss in something else." It means that you ONLY know one type of contradictions.....

I quote one phrase before this in the same Editorial: "Unlike in TRIZ, in economy parameters may become self-contradictory due to the feedback processes ! " It means that you DO NOT know about TRIZ considaration of different feedbacks.......

2) > Which irrelevant critique did you find in the journal ?

For example in the same issue http://www3.sympatico.ca/karasik/bru_bra_bha_innovation.html you wrote: I read the article .... As a result, I understood nothing. Let me tell you famous story about Albert Einstein: He did lecture in science congress and at the end asked: "Do you have questions ?" Another famoust scientists stood up and said: "I do not understand your equation 7." Albert Einstein answered:"This is the statement but not a question, next please."

I agree that some papers in WWW.TRIZ-JOURNAL.COM are not perfect, but normal scientific tradition is to review a paper before publication by referee, point weakness to author if necessary and publish improved paper. You turn process upside down - publish first then blame authors. For example from THE ANTI TRIZ-JOURNAL (Vol. 3, No. 10) : http://www3.sympatico.ca/karasik/GF_triz_consulting.html : "Ignorance is the second most prevalent feature of TRIZ consultants. The first one is eagerness to sell their baloney. This subject has been discussed and this fact has been demonstrated on various occasions in the Anti TRIZ-Journal." These statements have nothing to do with relevant critique of a paper.

Sincerely,

Juj Chan Hyjun